{"id":2203,"date":"2021-05-25T19:40:08","date_gmt":"2021-05-25T19:40:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/?post_type=legal_decisions&#038;p=2203"},"modified":"2026-01-29T18:23:33","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T18:23:33","slug":"iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell","status":"publish","type":"legal_decisions","link":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/","title":{"rendered":"AIEST, section locale 411 c. King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"2203\" class=\"elementor elementor-2203\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-bf291ad elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"bf291ad\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-aeb2db0\" data-id=\"aeb2db0\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-280ea2f elementor-widget elementor-widget-post-info\" data-id=\"280ea2f\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"post-info.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<ul class=\"elementor-inline-items elementor-icon-list-items elementor-post-info\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-be870e0 elementor-inline-item\" itemprop=\"datePublished\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fas fa-calendar\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-date\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t25 mai 2021\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-75a04ef elementor-inline-item\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/category\/collective-agreement-interpretation\/?post_types=legal_decisions\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"far fa-tags\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-custom\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tInterpr\u00e9tation de Convention Collective\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-f9b9e19 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"f9b9e19\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\" translation-block\">Dans le dossier AIEST, section locale 411 c. King Film Productions, l\u2019arbitre MacDowell a d\u00e9termin\u00e9 que le placement de toilettes portatives  pr\u00e8s d\u2019une \u00ab remorque s\u00e8che \u00bb ne constituait pas un honey wagon (roulotte sanitaire) tel que d\u00e9fini en vertu de la convention collective de la section locale 411 de l\u2019AIEST.<\/p><p>Un honey wagon est un type de camion gros porteur \u00e0 usage d\u00e9termin\u00e9 qui est utilis\u00e9 par les compagnies de production dans le cadre de tournages en ext\u00e9rieur. La convention collective de la section locale 411 pr\u00e9voyait que certaines t\u00e2ches li\u00e9es \u00e0 la conduite et la maintenance des honey wagons soient ex\u00e9cut\u00e9es par ses membres. La convention collective fournissait une d\u00e9finition tr\u00e8s restreinte de honey wagon : \u00ab tout v\u00e9hicule contenant de multiples compartiments ou unit\u00e9s, utilis\u00e9es comme vestiaires ou bureaux (occup\u00e9s ou non), avec des installations sanitaires pour l\u2019\u00e9quipe\u2026 \u00bb. En revanche, une \u00ab remorque s\u00e8che \u00bb est un type de v\u00e9hicule tr\u00e8s similaire contenant des chambres, mais ni toilettes ni plomberie.<\/p><p>Le grief est survenu car l\u2019Employeur a plac\u00e9 une \u00ab remorque s\u00e8che \u00bb \u00e0 proximit\u00e9 de toilettes portatives. Selon le Syndicat, cette installation, en effet, reproduisait les caract\u00e9ristiques fonctionnelles d\u2019un honey wagon car elle fournissait \u00e0 la fois des chambres et un acc\u00e8s de l\u2019\u00e9quipe aux toilettes. La position de l\u2019employeur \u00e9tait qu\u2019un v\u00e9hicule sans \u00ab installations sanitaires int\u00e9gr\u00e9es \u00e0 bord \u00bb ne pouvait \u00eatre qualifi\u00e9 de honey wagon, et qu\u2019un honey wagon \u00e9tait un \u00ab type de v\u00e9hicule unique et sp\u00e9cifiquement d\u00e9fini \u00bb. L\u2019employeur a fait valoir qu\u2019une \u00ab remorque s\u00e8che \u00bb ne devenait pas un honey wagon uniquement parce que des toilettes portatives \u00e9taient plac\u00e9es \u00e0 proximit\u00e9.<\/p><p>Pour d\u00e9cider la question, l\u2019arbitre MacDowell s\u2019est int\u00e9ress\u00e9 au texte de la convention collective, aux descriptions d\u2019emploi, aux pratiques pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes, et \u00e0 l\u2019historique de n\u00e9gociation entre les parties. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 not\u00e9 que la convention collective pr\u00e9voyait que l\u2019employeur avait le pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire de ne pas utiliser de honey wagon. Il y a \u00e9galement eu des preuves attestant que des ententes similaires avaient exist\u00e9 pendant plusieurs ann\u00e9es avant le grief, sans aucune plainte. En particulier, \u00ab le syndicat \u00e9tait au courant de ce genre d\u2019installations, pendant des ann\u00e9es, et personne n\u2019a jamais sugg\u00e9r\u00e9 qu\u2019elles constituaient un honey wagon \u00bb.<\/p><p>Le texte r\u00e9el de l\u2019entente collective a jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le primordial. L\u2019arbitre MacDowell a interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 la convention collective en se fondant sur le principe selon lequel les obligations des parties devaient \u00eatre d\u00e9termin\u00e9es \u00e0 partir des mots sp\u00e9cifiques employ\u00e9s, interpr\u00e9t\u00e9s dans leur contexte factuel et contractuel.<\/p><p>L\u2019arbitre MacDowell a remarqu\u00e9 que le \u00ab probl\u00e8me \u00bb dans cette affaire survenait du fait que l\u2019unit\u00e9 de n\u00e9gociation de la section locale 411 \u00e9tait confin\u00e9e \u00e0 une unique classe d\u2019emplois li\u00e9e \u00e0 une pi\u00e8ce d\u2019\u00e9quipement unique et sp\u00e9cifique (le honey wagon). L\u2019arbitre a not\u00e9 que, bien que ce soit malheureux, \u00e7a ne d\u00e9tournait pas l\u2019attention du fait que la section locale avait \u00ab d\u00e9fini ses droits juridiques exclusivement relativement \u00e0 un type particulier de v\u00e9hicule, tout en reconnaissant simultan\u00e9ment qu\u2019un employeur n\u2019\u00e9tait pas tenu d\u2019utiliser cet \u00e9quipement du tout. \u00bb L\u2019arbitre est d\u2019avis qu\u2019il n\u2019y avait aucun doute quant au fait que la section locale avait confin\u00e9 ses droits et son autorit\u00e9 professionnelle \u00e0 un seul type de v\u00e9hicule extr\u00eamement sp\u00e9cifique.<\/p><p class=\" translation-block\">De plus, l\u2019arbitre a conclu que le texte de la convention collective ne soutenait que peu une approche fonctionnelle. Par exemple, il a \u00e9t\u00e9 not\u00e9 que les mots de la d\u00e9finition de honey wagon \u00ab \u2026choisis si minutieusement, d\u00e9finissent et confinent les droits de n\u00e9gociation et l\u2019autorit\u00e9 professionnelle de la section locale 411, \u00e0 ce type de v\u00e9hicule UNIQUEMENT. \u00bb [soulignement dans l\u2019original] En particulier, l\u2019utilisation du verbe \u00ab \u00eatre \u00bb rend \u00e9vident que \u00ab pour qu\u2019une chose soit un honey wagon au sens de la convention collective, elle doit consister de, ou \u00eatre cette \u00ab chose \u00bb m\u00eame qui est d\u00e9crite dans les termes suivants. \u00bb  [soulignement dans l\u2019original] \u00c0 savoir, un v\u00e9hicule contenant des installations sanitaires pour l\u2019\u00e9quipe de tournage.<\/p><p class=\" translation-block\">L\u2019arbitre MacDowell a ensuite d\u00e9crit les questions qui se pr\u00e9senteraient en cas d\u2019adoption d\u2019une approche fonctionnelle. Plus particuli\u00e8rement, l\u2019autorit\u00e9 professionnelle entre les sections locales 411 et 873 de l\u2019AIEST (cette derni\u00e8re ayant autorit\u00e9 sur l\u2019exploitation des remorques s\u00e8ches et autres v\u00e9hicules) changerait selon la proximit\u00e9 entre des installations sanitaires et une remorque s\u00e8che. Par exemple, si un membre de la section locale 873 garait une remorque s\u00e8che pr\u00e8s d\u2019installations sanitaires, les caract\u00e9risations juridiques du v\u00e9hicule et du travail pourraient changer.  L\u2019arbitre MacDowell a conclu que la suggestion selon laquelle la simple proximit\u00e9 d\u2019une chose \u00e0 l\u2019autre pouvait modifier la caract\u00e9risation des deux objets \u00e9tait \u00e9trange. Par cons\u00e9quent, il a \u00e9t\u00e9 conclu que les questions op\u00e9rationnelles avaient tendance \u00e0 \u00ab soutenir une lecture plus simple du texte. \u00bb<\/p><p>Pour toutes ces raisons, l\u2019arbitre MacDowell a d\u00e9termin\u00e9 qu\u2019apr\u00e8s lecture appropri\u00e9e de la convention collective, l\u2019installation de la \u00ab remorque s\u00e8che \u00bb et des toilettes portatives ne pouvait constituer un honey wagon. Le grief a donc \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9.<\/p><p class=\" translation-block\">[1] Ibid., paragraphe 154.\n[2] Ibid., paragraphe 173.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onla\/doc\/2014\/2014canlii61350\/2014canlii61350.html\">Pour la d\u00e9cision compl\u00e8te, cliquez ici<\/a><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions, Arbitrator MacDowell determined that a portable toilet placed near a \u201cdry wagon\u201d did not constitute a \u201choney wagon\u201d as defined under the [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":10822,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","categories":[7],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell) - IATSE Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, nofollow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell) - IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions, Arbitrator MacDowell determined that a portable toilet placed near a \u201cdry wagon\u201d did not constitute a \u201choney wagon\u201d as defined under the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-29T18:23:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iatsecanada\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/\",\"name\":\"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell) - IATSE Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-25T19:40:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-29T18:23:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legal Decisions\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"description\":\"The Union Behind Entertainment\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"width\":1675,\"height\":1675,\"caption\":\"IATSE Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell) - IATSE Canada","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"nofollow"},"og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell) - IATSE Canada","og_description":"In IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions, Arbitrator MacDowell determined that a portable toilet placed near a \u201cdry wagon\u201d did not constitute a \u201choney wagon\u201d as defined under the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/","og_site_name":"IATSE Canada","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","article_modified_time":"2026-01-29T18:23:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@iatsecanada","twitter_misc":{"Estimation du temps de lecture":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/","name":"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell) - IATSE Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","datePublished":"2021-05-25T19:40:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-29T18:23:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/iatse-local-411-v-king-film-productions-r-o-macdowell\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legal Decisions","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"IATSE, Local 411 v King Film Productions \u2013 (R.O. MacDowell)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","name":"IATSE Canada","description":"The Union Behind Entertainment","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization","name":"IATSE Canada","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","width":1675,"height":1675,"caption":"IATSE Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/2203"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal_decisions"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/2203\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2603,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/2203\/revisions\/2603"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}