{"id":4327,"date":"2021-06-10T16:48:02","date_gmt":"2021-06-10T16:48:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/?post_type=legal_decisions&#038;p=4327"},"modified":"2026-01-29T21:01:36","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T21:01:36","slug":"biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95","status":"publish","type":"legal_decisions","link":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/","title":{"rendered":"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"4327\" class=\"elementor elementor-4327\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-242851a elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"242851a\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-856400b\" data-id=\"856400b\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-ad82620 elementor-widget elementor-widget-post-info\" data-id=\"ad82620\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"post-info.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<ul class=\"elementor-inline-items elementor-icon-list-items elementor-post-info\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-3c25631 elementor-inline-item\" itemprop=\"datePublished\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fas fa-calendar\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-date\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t10 juin 2021\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-cc8099e elementor-inline-item\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/category\/court-decisions-appeals-judicial-reviews\/?post_types=legal_decisions\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"far fa-tags\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-custom\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tD\u00e9cisions des Tribunaux (Appels, R\u00e9visions Judiciaires)\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-916ca58 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"916ca58\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Le 11 f\u00e9vrier 2019, la Cour du Banc de la Reine de l'Alberta a d\u00e9termin\u00e9 que Jonathan Biley \u00e9tait un plaideur qu\u00e9rulent et l'a interdit d'intenter une action devant les cours de l'Alberta sans obtenir au pr\u00e9alable une ordonnance de la Cour.<\/p><p>Biley avait d\u00e9pos\u00e9 une action contre Sherwood Ford Sales Limited r\u00e9clamant des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour une p\u00e9riode d'emploi de six semaines. Biley a all\u00e9gu\u00e9 qu'il n'avait pas re\u00e7u les commissions qu'il aurait d\u00fb recevoir. Biley a ensuite d\u00e9pos\u00e9 deux autres actions connexes. Le premier \u00e9tait un recours collectif dans lequel il \u00e9tait le demandeur repr\u00e9sentant une cat\u00e9gorie de vendeurs contre le m\u00eame d\u00e9fendeur. La seconde \u00e9tait une action dans laquelle Biley et la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 dont il est propri\u00e9taire ont all\u00e9gu\u00e9 que la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 en mesure de faire breveter des syst\u00e8mes de drones pour la r\u00e9colte d\u2019algues en raison de la conduite de l\u2019employeur et d\u2019autres employ\u00e9s.<\/p><p>Le d\u00e9fendeur Sherwood a demand\u00e9 \u00e0 la Cour de d\u00e9terminer que Biley \u00e9tait un plaideur qu\u00e9rulent. Le juge Kendall a examin\u00e9 les actions connexes et a d\u00e9termin\u00e9 qu'il n'y avait aucune raison de d\u00e9poser la d\u00e9claration dans l'affaire Island c Sherwood, qui constituait une attaque indirecte contre les autres actions, et qu'il s'\u00e9tait engag\u00e9 dans \"un litige sans fondement et sans espoir\". La cour a d\u00e9crit Biley comme un plaideur infatigable. La Cour a \u00e9galement d\u00e9termin\u00e9 que le recours collectif \u00e9tait un \"litige inutile, abusif et une attaque indirecte\" des autres actions qu'il avait intent\u00e9es. Ces deux actions ont \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9s pour raisons qu'elles \u00e9taient un litige en double.<\/p><p>La Cour a \u00e9galement examin\u00e9 les actions connexes de Biley dans lesquelles Biley cherchait \u00e0 faire d\u00e9clarer Sherwood, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9fenderesse, un plaideur qu\u00e9rulent. Dans une des requ\u00eates connexes, Biley a demand\u00e9 que l'avocat du d\u00e9fendeur paye les frais et \u00e0 ce que cet avocat soit retir\u00e9 de l'action. Biley a aussi accus\u00e9 l'avocat du d\u00e9fendeur de pratiques d\u00e9loyales, d'avoir viol\u00e9 les ordonnances judiciaire et d'avoir falsifier des documents. Biley a \u00e9galement fait valoir que le cabinet d\u2019avocats national DLA Piper \u00e9tait lui-m\u00eame de mauvaise r\u00e9putation. La Cour a rejet\u00e9 les all\u00e9gations de Biley et a not\u00e9 que ces demandes connexes \u00e9taient des indices de litiges abusifs dans la mesure o\u00f9 il avait adopt\u00e9 des strat\u00e9gies de mauvaise foi pour saboter les proc\u00e9dures.<\/p><p>La Cour a discut\u00e9 de la jurisprudence en Alberta concernant les litiges vexatoires. Onze types de comportement contentieux abusif ont \u00e9t\u00e9 identifi\u00e9s, notamment:<\/p><ul><li style=\"list-style-type: none;\"><ul><li>les attaques indirectes,<\/li><li>les requ\u00eates sans espoir,<\/li><li>l'escalade des proc\u00e9dures,<\/li><li>engager des poursuites \u00e0 des fins inappropri\u00e9es,<\/li><li>engager des poursuites fouineuses pour faire respecter les droits all\u00e9gu\u00e9s de tiers partie,<\/li><li>le non-respect des obligations impos\u00e9es par une cour,<\/li><li>en continuant \u00e0 interjeter appel des d\u00e9cisions de justice sans succ\u00e8s,<\/li><li>avoir un comportement inappropri\u00e9 dans la salle d'audience,<\/li><li>des all\u00e9gations non fond\u00e9es de complot, de fraude et de mauvaise conduite,<\/li><li>langage scandaleux ou incendiaire dans les plaidoiries ou devant le tribunal et dans la promotion de strat\u00e9gies d'arguments commerciaux pseudo-juridiques organis\u00e9es.<\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><p>Le juge Kendall a identifi\u00e9 un certain nombre de ces indices dans la conduite de Biley, notamment des actions fouineuses, des actions futiles, des attaques indirectes et des attaques sans fondement contre un avocat all\u00e9guant un complot, la fraude et la mauvaise conduite. Biley a \u00e9galement tent\u00e9 de rechercher des juges accommodant afin de retirer le juge Maher dans une instance, ce qui est un autre indice d'un plaideur abusif. Le juge Kendall a finalement d\u00e9termin\u00e9 que l'action Biley c. Sherwood \u00e0 la Cour du Banc de la Reine de l'Alberta constituait un abus de proc\u00e9dure judiciaire, mettant fin \u00e0 toutes ses actions en justice.<\/p><p>La cour a ensuite d\u00e9termin\u00e9 quelles restrictions \u00e9taient appropri\u00e9es pour g\u00e9rer les futurs litiges de Biley. La Cour a ordonn\u00e9 que Biley et \u00e0 son entreprise sont interdits de d\u00e9poser ou de poursuivre un appel devant la Cour d'appel de l'Alberta, la Cour du Banc de la Reine de l'Alberta ou la Cour provinciale. De plus, Biley et son entreprise doivent s'identifier nomm\u00e9ment dans toute demande d'autorisation et non par aucun pseudonyme. Des restrictions strictes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 impos\u00e9es sur l'introduction d'une demande ou d'une autre proc\u00e9dure, y compris par \u00e9crit pour demander l'autorisation en \u00e9crivant \u00e0 un juge. La cour peut autoriser une action sous conditions. De plus, il a \u00e9t\u00e9 express\u00e9ment interdit \u00e0 Biley de fournir des conseils juridiques, de pr\u00e9parer des documents d\u00e9pos\u00e9s en cour ou d\u2019agir en tant que mandataires. Le tribunal a impos\u00e9 des conditions strictes \u00e0 son aptitude \u00e0 communiquer avec le tribunal et ses greffiers.<\/p><p>Le tribunal a ordonn\u00e9 \u00e0 Biley de payer 17 500 $ au d\u00e9fendeur.<\/p><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.canlii.org\/en\/on\/onscdc\/doc\/2019\/2019onsc1167\/2019onsc1167.html\">Pour la d\u00e9cision compl\u00e8te, cliquez ici<\/a><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 11 f\u00e9vrier 2019, la Cour du banc de la Reine de l'Alberta a d\u00e9termin\u00e9 que Jonathan Biley est un plaideur vexatoire et lui a interdit d'entamer une proc\u00e9dure devant les tribunaux de l'Alberta sans [...]<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":10822,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","categories":[10],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 - IATSE Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, nofollow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 - IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On February 11, 2019 the Alberta Court of Queens\u2019 Bench determined that Jonathan Biley is a vexatious litigant and prohibited him from commencing a proceeding in the Alberta Courts without [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-29T21:01:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iatsecanada\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/\",\"name\":\"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 - IATSE Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-06-10T16:48:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-29T21:01:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legal Decisions\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"description\":\"The Union Behind Entertainment\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"width\":1675,\"height\":1675,\"caption\":\"IATSE Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 - IATSE Canada","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"nofollow"},"og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 - IATSE Canada","og_description":"On February 11, 2019 the Alberta Court of Queens\u2019 Bench determined that Jonathan Biley is a vexatious litigant and prohibited him from commencing a proceeding in the Alberta Courts without [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/","og_site_name":"IATSE Canada","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","article_modified_time":"2026-01-29T21:01:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@iatsecanada","twitter_misc":{"Estimation du temps de lecture":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/","name":"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95 - IATSE Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","datePublished":"2021-06-10T16:48:02+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-29T21:01:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/biley-v-sherwood-ford-sales-limited-2019-abqb-95\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legal Decisions","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Biley v Sherwood Ford Sales Limited, 2019 ABQB 95"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","name":"IATSE Canada","description":"The Union Behind Entertainment","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization","name":"IATSE Canada","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","width":1675,"height":1675,"caption":"IATSE Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/4327"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal_decisions"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/4327\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10868,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/4327\/revisions\/10868"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4327"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4327"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4327"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}