{"id":7831,"date":"2023-06-27T18:14:08","date_gmt":"2023-06-27T18:14:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/?post_type=legal_decisions&#038;p=7831"},"modified":"2026-01-30T14:05:55","modified_gmt":"2026-01-30T14:05:55","slug":"bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022","status":"publish","type":"legal_decisions","link":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), d\u00e9cision du 14 janvier, 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"7831\" class=\"elementor elementor-7831\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-2dd8b70a elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"2dd8b70a\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-1ded9d68\" data-id=\"1ded9d68\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-f30c891 elementor-widget elementor-widget-post-info\" data-id=\"f30c891\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"post-info.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<ul class=\"elementor-inline-items elementor-icon-list-items elementor-post-info\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-5cb89c3 elementor-inline-item\" itemprop=\"datePublished\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fas fa-calendar\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-date\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t27 juin 2023\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-809e2e8 elementor-inline-item\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/category\/non-ia-decisions-of-interest\/?post_types=legal_decisions\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"far fa-tags\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-custom\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tD\u00e9cisions d'Int\u00e9r\u00eat autre qu\u2019AIEST\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7cc0f403 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"7cc0f403\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Cette affaire concernait un recours collectif propos\u00e9 par la repr\u00e9sentante des demandeurs, Anna Bouque, contre le groupe de soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de production t\u00e9l\u00e9visuelle d\u00e9fenderesse all\u00e9guant une classification erron\u00e9e des employ\u00e9s. L\u2019action a \u00e9t\u00e9 intent\u00e9e le 21 f\u00e9vrier 2020.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Dans sa d\u00e9cision du 14 janvier 2022, le juge Belobaba de la Cour sup\u00e9rieure de justice de l\u2019Ontario a rejet\u00e9 un recours collectif envisag\u00e9 pour retard en vertu de l\u2019article 29.1 de la <em>Loi de 1992 sur les recours collectifs<\/em> (la \u00ab Loi \u00bb) de l'Ontario. Il s\u2019agissait de la premi\u00e8re d\u00e9cision publi\u00e9e de la Cour interpr\u00e9tant l\u2019article 29.1 de la Loi apr\u00e8s l\u2019ajout de cet article \u00e0 la loi en octobre 2020.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>En vertu du nouvel article 29.1 de la Loi, \u00e0 moins que certaines mesures aient \u00e9t\u00e9 prises dans l\u2019ann\u00e9e suivant le d\u00e9but de l\u2019instance, sur pr\u00e9sentation d'une motion, la Cour rejettera l\u2019instance pour cause de retard. Cet article s'appliquait r\u00e9troactivement aux poursuites intent\u00e9es avant l'entr\u00e9e en vigueur de l'article 29.1, y compris l'action intent\u00e9e par Bourque.\nLa Cour a statu\u00e9 que le rejet pour retard en vertu de l'article 29.1 \u00e9tait obligatoire et qu'elle n'avait pas le pouvoir discr\u00e9tionnaire de rendre une d\u00e9cision diff\u00e9rente, mais qu'\u00e9viter le rejet en vertu de cet article \u00e9tait une barre basse et seulement une des conditions des paragraphes a), b) ou c) devait \u00eatre satisfaite, notamment en \u00e9tablissant et en d\u00e9posant un calendrier pour la signification du dossier de requ\u00eate du repr\u00e9sentant des demandeurs.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/tinyurl.com\/mu5r9buv\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Pour consulter la d\u00e9cision compl\u00e8te, cliquez ici.<\/a><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cette affaire concerne une action collective propos\u00e9e par la repr\u00e9sentante des plaignants, Anna Bouque, \u00e0 l'encontre du groupe de soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de production t\u00e9l\u00e9visuelle d\u00e9fenderesses, all\u00e9guant une classification erron\u00e9e des employ\u00e9s. L'action a \u00e9t\u00e9 introduite le 21 f\u00e9vrier [...]<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":10822,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","categories":[13],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022 - IATSE Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022 - IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"This case concerned a proposed class action by representative plaintiff Anna Bouque against the defendant group of television production companies alleging employee misclassification. The action was commenced on February 21, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-30T14:05:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iatsecanada\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/\",\"name\":\"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022 - IATSE Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-27T18:14:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-30T14:05:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legal Decisions\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"description\":\"The Union Behind Entertainment\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"width\":1675,\"height\":1675,\"caption\":\"IATSE Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022 - IATSE Canada","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow"},"og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022 - IATSE Canada","og_description":"This case concerned a proposed class action by representative plaintiff Anna Bouque against the defendant group of television production companies alleging employee misclassification. The action was commenced on February 21, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/","og_site_name":"IATSE Canada","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","article_modified_time":"2026-01-30T14:05:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@iatsecanada","twitter_misc":{"Estimation du temps de lecture":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/","name":"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022 - IATSE Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","datePublished":"2023-06-27T18:14:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-30T14:05:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bourque-v-insight-productions-2022-onsc-174-canlii-decision-of-january-14-2022\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legal Decisions","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Bourque v. Insight Productions, 2022 ONSC 174 (CanLII), decision of January 14, 2022"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","name":"IATSE Canada","description":"The Union Behind Entertainment","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization","name":"IATSE Canada","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","width":1675,"height":1675,"caption":"IATSE Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/7831"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal_decisions"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/7831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10935,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/7831\/revisions\/10935"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}