{"id":904,"date":"2021-05-24T21:04:01","date_gmt":"2021-05-24T21:04:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/?post_type=legal_decisions&#038;p=904"},"modified":"2026-01-29T20:45:15","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T20:45:15","slug":"bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration","status":"publish","type":"legal_decisions","link":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/","title":{"rendered":"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions c. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitre Lanyon ; Arbitrage de grief)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"904\" class=\"elementor elementor-904\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-e13ffc9 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"e13ffc9\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-8ae666e\" data-id=\"8ae666e\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-32f1321 elementor-widget elementor-widget-post-info\" data-id=\"32f1321\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"post-info.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<ul class=\"elementor-inline-items elementor-icon-list-items elementor-post-info\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-c432e49 elementor-inline-item\" itemprop=\"datePublished\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"fas fa-calendar\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-date\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t24 mai 2021\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<li class=\"elementor-icon-list-item elementor-repeater-item-84dd904 elementor-inline-item\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/category\/miscellaneous\/?post_types=legal_decisions\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-icon\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<i aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"far fa-tags\"><\/i>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"elementor-icon-list-text elementor-post-info__item elementor-post-info__item--type-custom\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tDivers\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<\/li>\n\t\t\t\t<\/ul>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-d8e5544 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"d8e5544\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Lorsqu'un membre non r\u00e9sident de la Colombie-Britannique, Tor Baxter, s'est vu refuser un emploi sur la production, le syndicat a d\u00e9pos\u00e9 un grief et demand\u00e9 une d\u00e9claration selon laquelle la r\u00e8gle unilat\u00e9rale de l'employeur exigeant la r\u00e9sidence en Colombie-Britannique \u00e9tait d\u00e9raisonnable et contraire \u00e0 la Charte canadienne des droits et libert\u00e9s.  L'employeur a fait valoir que le grief n'\u00e9tait pas arbitrable parce que le plaignant n'\u00e9tait pas employ\u00e9 au moment o\u00f9 le grief a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9pos\u00e9 et que l'exigence de r\u00e9sidence de l'employeur \u00e9tait raisonnable parce que la r\u00e9sidence \u00e9tait requise pour que la production puisse obtenir des cr\u00e9dits d'imp\u00f4t provinciaux et f\u00e9d\u00e9raux.  En ce qui concerne l\u2019argument \u00e0 l\u2019effet que le grief soit non arbitrable, l'arbitre a conclu en faveur du syndicat que le grief \u00e9tait arbitrable, d\u00e9clarant que \"si les membres du syndicat n'avaient pas le droit de contester les r\u00e9partitions... alors ces membres n'auraient aucun droit en ce qui concerne les possibilit\u00e9s d'emploi\".  En ce qui concerne l'exigence de r\u00e9sidence, l'arbitre a conclu qu'elle \u00e9tait raisonnable en vertu de la convention collective et de la jurisprudence pertinente (le test KVP) parce que :<\/p><ol><li style=\"list-style-type: none;\"><ol><li>il y avait un \"lien direct et important entre l'exigence de r\u00e9sidence     de l'employeur et le cr\u00e9dit d'imp\u00f4t provincial qui, en vertu de la loi, ne s'applique qu'aux employ\u00e9s qui sont r\u00e9sidents de la province\" ;<\/li><li>les cr\u00e9dits d'imp\u00f4t provincial et f\u00e9d\u00e9ral \u00e9taient importants ;<\/li><li>l'Agence du revenu du Canada effectue des v\u00e9rifications r\u00e9guli\u00e8res et a toujours refus\u00e9 d'accorder le cr\u00e9dit d'imp\u00f4t provincial \u00e0 tout employ\u00e9 qui n'est pas un r\u00e9sident de la Colombie-Britannique ;<\/li><li>les exceptions \u00e0 l'exigence de r\u00e9sidence pour les personnes exceptionnellement qualifi\u00e9es et\/ou leurs assistants sp\u00e9ciaux sont elles-m\u00eames raisonnables et repr\u00e9sentent une \"approche coh\u00e9rente et de bon sens de la viabilit\u00e9 commerciale de chaque production\" ;<\/li><li>l'obligation de r\u00e9sidence est conforme \u00e0 la convention collective dans la mesure o\u00f9 elle contient une obligation de divulgation, de sorte que \"les parties ont reconnu contractuellement l'importance de la r\u00e9sidence pour attirer des productions dans la province et l'importance de ces cr\u00e9dits d'imp\u00f4t pour l'emploi de membres du syndicat dans ces productions\" ;<\/li><li>Le syndicat a particip\u00e9 aux efforts d\u00e9ploy\u00e9s par les employeurs pour persuader le gouvernement provincial de l'importance cruciale des cr\u00e9dits d'imp\u00f4t pour l'industrie cin\u00e9matographique de la province ; et<\/li><li>Les cas pr\u00e9c\u00e9dents concernaient une exigence de r\u00e9sidence dans une municipalit\u00e9 sp\u00e9cifique, alors que le cas pr\u00e9sent concernait la province enti\u00e8re (pour le cr\u00e9dit provincial) et le pays entier (pour le cr\u00e9dit f\u00e9d\u00e9ral).<\/li><\/ol><\/li><\/ol><p>L'arbitre a refus\u00e9 d'examiner les arguments du syndicat en vertu de la Charte canadienne des droits et libert\u00e9s, d\u00e9clarant que le syndicat cherchait de mani\u00e8re inappropri\u00e9e \u00e0 contester indirectement la constitutionnalit\u00e9 de l'exigence de r\u00e9sidence alors qu'il n'aurait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 autoris\u00e9 \u00e0 le faire directement ; en fait, il cherchait \" non seulement une d\u00e9finition du caract\u00e8re raisonnable fond\u00e9e sur les valeurs de la Charte, mais plut\u00f4t des conclusions et des r\u00e9parations fond\u00e9es sur la Charte en ce qui concerne la question de l'exigence de r\u00e9sidence dans l'industrie cin\u00e9matographique en Colombie-Britannique \".<\/p><p><a href=\"mailto:cdnoffice@iatse.net\">R\u00e9f\u00e9rence# 8-7<\/a><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When a non-resident member of British Columbia, Tor Baxter, was denied employment on the production, the union filed a grievance and asked for a declaration that the Employer\u2019s unilateral rule [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"featured_media":10822,"menu_order":0,"template":"","format":"standard","categories":[12],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration) - IATSE Canada<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, nofollow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_CA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration) - IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When a non-resident member of British Columbia, Tor Baxter, was denied employment on the production, the union filed a grievance and asked for a declaration that the Employer\u2019s unilateral rule [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IATSE Canada\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-01-29T20:45:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@iatsecanada\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Estimation du temps de lecture\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/\",\"name\":\"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration) - IATSE Canada\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-05-24T21:04:01+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-01-29T20:45:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1080},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Legal Decisions\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"description\":\"The Union Behind Entertainment\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"IATSE Canada\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-CA\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png\",\"width\":1675,\"height\":1675,\"caption\":\"IATSE Canada\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration) - IATSE Canada","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"nofollow"},"og_locale":"fr_CA","og_type":"article","og_title":"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration) - IATSE Canada","og_description":"When a non-resident member of British Columbia, Tor Baxter, was denied employment on the production, the union filed a grievance and asked for a declaration that the Employer\u2019s unilateral rule [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/","og_site_name":"IATSE Canada","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","article_modified_time":"2026-01-29T20:45:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","type":"image\/png"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@iatsecanada","twitter_misc":{"Estimation du temps de lecture":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/","name":"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration) - IATSE Canada","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","datePublished":"2021-05-24T21:04:01+00:00","dateModified":"2026-01-29T20:45:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"fr-CA","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2025\/11\/Legal-Decision-Categories.png","width":1920,"height":1080},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legal_decisions\/bc-and-yukon-council-of-film-unions-v-stargate-universe-productions-ii-inc-2011-arbitrator-lanyon-grievance-arbitration\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Legal Decisions","item":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/legaldb\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"BC and Yukon Council of Film Unions v. Stargate Universe Productions II Inc. [2011] (Arbitrator Lanyon; Grievance Arbitration)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","name":"IATSE Canada","description":"The Union Behind Entertainment","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"fr-CA"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#organization","name":"IATSE Canada","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-CA","@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/02\/Canadian-Bug-Clear-BG.png","width":1675,"height":1675,"caption":"IATSE Canada"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/iatsecanada\/","https:\/\/x.com\/iatsecanada"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/904"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/legal_decisions"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/904\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10866,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/legal_decisions\/904\/revisions\/10866"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/canada.iatse.net\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}