Archives : Legal Decisions

Following the local’s application for certification, Keystone filed a letter of response, not supported by Statutory Declaration, in which it indicated that it had never had stagehands in its employ,

Application for certification.  Local 58 was certified for “all stage employees employed by GBSP Centre Corp. o/a Young Centre for the Performing Arts in the City of Toronto, save and

Application for certification.  The Ontario Labour Relations Board directed the counting of the ballots notwithstanding the employer was seeking a judicial review of both the Board’s decision and its refusal

Application for certification. The Council applied for a unit consisting of “employees and dependent contractors except production and unit managers, directors, assistant directors, location managers, assistant location mangers, trainee assistant

Application for certification.  The employer disputed the local’s proposed description of the bargaining unit; in particular, it requested the exclusion of the Technical Director and Production Assistant.  The Board determined

Application for certification.  Following a representation vote, there remained a dispute three issues: a dispute with respect to the status of two employees; the bargaining unit description; and the applicant’s

Application by local 471 for certification of City of Kingston employees engaged in theatrical presentation and production.  The Board directed that a representation vote be taken after finding that not

Application for certification where the union filed membership evidence after the date of the certification application.  The Employer argued that the union’s evidence should not be accepted, with the result

Local 891 and Teamsters local 155 applied for certification as a polyparty union under the Labour Code.  The Employer and ACFC objected to the application on the ground that the

Application for certification.  The local sought to be certified for “all employees [of the theatre] except office, clerical, performers, designers and front of house personnel”.  A vote was held and