ACFC West Local 2020 v. Local 891 [2004] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 344 (BC Labour Relations Board)
First of two decisions. ACFC applied for a cease and desist order against the IATSE local, asserting that the IATSE
Legal Decisions
Union of B.C. Performers v. Local 891 et al [2003] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 437 (BC Labour Relations Board)
The UBCP applied for a declaration that a term of an agreement it had negotiated with the UCBU and the
Local 295 v. Casino Regina and PSAC [2003] S.L.R.B.D. No. 6 (Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board)
Local 295 applied for certification of casual light and sound technicians working at the Casino. Although the PSAC had previously
Teamsters local 155 v. Local 891, Local 669 and the AMPTP [2003] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 250 (BC Labour Relations Board)
Third of three decisions. Application by teamsters’ local 155 for review of the arbitration award “Re: Jurisdictional Dispute: Forklifts et
Teamsters Local 155 v. Local 891, Local 669 and the AMPTP [2002] B.C.C.A.A.A. No. 277 (BC Collective Agreement Arbitration)
Second of three decisions. Jurisdiction dispute regarding forklifts, genie lifts, man lifts, condors, Z-booms, lighting cranes, chapman cranes, blue chip
Teamsters local 155 v. Local 891, Local 669 and the AMPTP [2001] B.C.C.A.A.A. No. 315 (BC Collective Agreement Arbitration)
First of three decisions. Preliminary decision on jurisdictional dispute regarding golf carts, forklifts and other similar vehicles. Based on his
Teamsters Local 155 v. Sugar Mountain Productions and Local 669 and Local 891 and Phoenix and International Stage Lines et al [2002] B.C.L.R.B.D. No. 268 (BC Labour Relations Board)
The Teamsters applied for a declaration that local 669 and local 891, Phoenix and International Stage Lines did not have
Local 58 v. Nasco Services Inc. [2002] O.L.R.D. No. 2825 (Ontario Labour Relations Board)
Application for certification (first of two decisions). Nasco disputed the appropriateness and the local’s estimate of the number of employees
Exhibition Place v. Local 58 [2002] O.L.A.A. No. 3245 (Ontario Labour Relations Board)
The dispute concerned the assignment of installation of surveillance cameras to the IBEW (grieved by local 58) and the assignment
Exhibition Place v. Local 58 [2002] O.L.A.A. No. 155 (Ontario Labour Arbitration)
The local filed two grievances relating to events during which third parties engaged non-IATSE individuals. The work was within the