Second of three decisions. Application by the employer for reconsideration of BCLRB No. B149/2000. The administrative employees did not seek reconsideration of the Board’s denial of their application to revoke
First of three decisions. Application by the employer to vary to local’s certification by deleting administrative personnel and creating a separate certification and a separate bargaining unit for such employees.
Application for certification. The employer raised three objections: (1) that the unit applied for was not appropriate for collective bargaining because it combined the house crew and casual employees; (2)
Second of two decisions. Local 891 and teamsters local 155 applied to the Board for a reconsideration of an earlier decision that a collective agreement was in full force and
First of two decisions. When local 891 and teamsters local 155 filed an application for certification of Shavick Entertainment and AFS Production, ACFC West claimed it was a raid and
After the local withdrew an application for certification upon considering that a vote would not be successful, the employer argued that a bar should be imposed. The Board declined to
Local 118 applied for leave for reconsideration of an earlier decision wherein its certification application for a bargaining unit of employees employed by the University of British Columbia working at
Application for certification. At the time of the application, no employees were working for Crocodile at the Molson Amphitheatre. The local argued that it was not relevant whether or not
Application for certification. The local sought to represent the theatre’s stage employees. The only dispute between the parties was whether the stage employees were employees or whether they were independent
Application for certification. The Board found the “producer” rather than “the house” to be the employer of the stagehands dispatched from the union’s hiring hall and that for purposes of
© Copyright 2024 IATSE. All Rights Reserved.
